Skip Navigation

The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 2008 1(1):55-97; doi:10.1093/jwelb/jwn005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in J World Energy Law Bus
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wälde, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the AIPN. All rights reserved.

Renegotiating acquired rights in the oil and gas industries: Industry and political cycles meet the rule of law

Thomas W. Wälde*

* Dr. iur (Frankfurt), LLM. (Harvard), Professor and Jean-Monnet Chair, CEPMLP, University of Dundee; Rechtsanwalt (Frankfurt) and barrister (Essex Court Chambers/Lincoln’s Inn (London)).

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    1. The issue: Do the instruments of good governance and the rule of law have any significance when faced with the force of the energy and resource industries cycles?
 
As we experience a so far sustained upwards trend in the price of petroleum and minerals,1 governments of producing countries worldwide are engaged in a fundamental revision of the terms under which international investors originally carried out their investment.2 Changes are most extensive in the cases where contracts with host states (or their state enterprises) were negotiated in times of relatively low oil, gas and mineral prices (in particular between 1985 and 1999); in the cases where a fundamental re-orientation of a host state’s policy towards foreign and private investment has taken place (eg in countries where governments now pursue a policy of anti-Western (in particular anti-USA) resource nationalism); and in the cases where new governments have reversed visibly and significantly the policies of privatization of state-owned operated upstream oil and gas and mining assets carried out in the 1990s. The renegotiation demands are more acute where the original contracts . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    2. Context of current energy and resource investment disputes
 

    3. What does this mean for the dynamics of investment disputes?
 

    4. Types and dynamics of investment disputes
 

    5. Rights, rules and procedures cannot resist the forces of the cycle – But they can proceduralize conflict and make the inevitable changes more palatable
 

    6. The 'rule of law': Primarily a concept of Western culture?
 

    7. International protection of investor rights: The grand experiment of anchoring western ‘rule of law’ by way of international law and adjudication
 

    8. Conclusion
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in J World Energy Law Bus:

JWELB Overview

J World Energy Law Bus 2008 1: 3-4. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]